PA Supreme Court overturns Gun plus Drug Dealing Mandatory Minimum Sentence

Supreme Court Overturns Drug plus Gun Mandatory Sentence:   In the case of Commonwealth vs. Hanson, __ A.3d.__, 2013 WL 6831854 (Pa. Supreme Ct., December 27, 2013), opinion by Justice Saylor, the application of a gun plus drug dealing mandatory minimum is overruled, because the court ruled that a defendant (Hanson) must be in knowing, physical possession or control, which is constructive control/possession, of the drugs and the firearm must be in close proximity to the drugs in question.  The appeal centrally presents questions of statutory construction pertaining to 5 year mandatory minimum sentences attaching to the offense of possession of a controlled substance with the intent to deliver (PWID), 35 P.S. 780-113(a)(30), while in possession or control of a firearm, 42 Pa.C.S. 9712.1(a).    

On June 7, 2007, an undercover narcotics officer met with Hanson outside a 2 story row house in Philadelphia.  There, the officer purchased packets of crack cocaine from Hanson, who then entered the locked residence using a key. Officers observed Hanson repeatedly entering the row house with the key the next day. Hanson was the only person observed entering and exiting the home. Police executed a search warrant at the property and arrested Hanson on the 1st floor.  On his person, Hanson had cash and the key, but no drugs.  A search of the 2nd floor uncovered: (1) from the front bedroom, a cell phone, electronic scale, a various drug-related paraphernalia; (2) from the middle bedroom, a clear plastic baggie containing 14 packets of crack cocaine; (3) from the only bathroom in the house, a baggie containing PCP; and (4) from the rear bedroom, a handgun loaded with 7 live rounds.  No drugs or paraphernalia were discovered in the rear bedroom which contained the firearm.

Hanson argued that he was not in physical possession or control of the firearm; the firearm was not in close proximity to the controlled substances; and he did not have the requisite men's rea for purposes of Section 9712.1(a), the mandatory minimum 5-year prison sentence.  

Based upon a series of considerations outlined in the court's opinion, the case was remanded for resentencing, with the admonition that imposition of the mandatory sentence under Section 9712.1(a) be applied on a correct legal analysis and supported findings.      

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information
Email Us For A Response

Is Your Case Ready For Trial?

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.


Privacy Policy

Lancaster Office
53 North Duke Street Suite 1
Lancaster, PA 17602

Toll Free: 866-614-6520
Phone: 717-406-1794
Lancaster Law Office Map

York Office
11 E. Market Street, Suite 102
Rich Executive Building
York, Pennsylvania 17401

Phone: 717-848-4200
York Law Office Map