Marinaro Law Firm

Marinaro Law Firm

Toll Free:
866-614-6520

Fierce Dedication To Detail, A Force In The Courtroom

Marinaro Law Firm

Marinaro Law Firm

Fierce Dedication To Detail, A Force In The Courtroom

Home 9 Criminal Defense 9 What Is A Strict Liability Crime?

What Is A Strict Liability Crime?

Police woman giving ticket to a male driver in a white car

Imagine you’re driving through Pennsylvania, enjoying the scenic beauty of its vast landscapes. You decide to make your trip more adventurous by exploring some less-known, off-the-beaten-path locations. In your excitement and perhaps a bit of carelessness, you don’t notice the signs indicating that you are entering a protected wildlife area where entry is strictly prohibited without a permit.

Unaware, you continue your adventure, inadvertently committing a strict liability crime. In Pennsylvania, entering protected areas without explicit permission falls under strict liability offenses, where your intent or knowledge of the crime is irrelevant for prosecution. Your innocent adventure can suddenly turn into a legal issue, illustrating how easy it is to unknowingly commit a strict liability crime.

In this blog post, we will cover what is a strict liability crime, what strict liability in criminal law means, and how these criminal acts can affect your future. Additionally, we will also discuss how a court of law has to prove strict liability cases, and what the general penalties are for them.

The Legal Definition Of Strict Liability Crimes in Pennsylvania

In Pennsylvania, strict liability offenses are defined when a person is guilty of any conduct defined by statute or regulation as an offense without having to prove culpability. This means that even if you had no idea that your actions were illegal, you could still be charged and convicted for committing the act.

In summary, a strict liability offense does not require the prosecution to prove the intent or knowledge of the accused. It doesn’t matter if you intentionally committed the crime or not; if you are found to have done the act, you can be convicted.

What Are The Elements Of Strict Liability?

The three key elements that define strict liability offenses are cornerstones in legal contexts. These elements typically include the absence of intent, the focus on the act itself rather than the mental state of the individual, and strict accountability regardless of fault.

When these elements come together in particular criminal acts, strict liability crimes are established. This means that even if you did not have the intention to commit a crime or were unaware of your actions’ consequences, you can still be found guilty.

In the scenario mentioned earlier, the prohibited act was entering a protected wildlife area without a permit, and the prescribed penalty could be a fine or imprisonment. The absence of a mental state requirement means that even if you had no intention or knowledge of the crime, you could still be held liable for your actions, even if you’re unaware of what a strict liability crime is in that area.

Common Strict Liability Offenses

For strict liability in criminal law, the prosecution only needs to prove that the accused committed the act and does not have to establish intent or knowledge. These examples of strict liability are easier to prosecute than those that require proof of intent, making strict liability crimes an essential tool for law enforcement in promoting public safety.

Some common examples of strict liability crimes include traffic offenses such as driving above the posted speed limit or parking tickets, public health and safety regulations such as selling expired food products, and environmental regulations such as illegal dumping.

Strict liability laws can vary from state to state. In Pennsylvania, strict liability applies to:

  • Selling tobacco or alcohol to a minor
  • Getting a speeding ticket while driving a commercial vehicle
  • Possession of controlled substances, such as marijuana
  • Failure to comply with building codes and safety regulations

How Are Strict Liability Crimes Proven in Court?

In Pennsylvania, the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that you committed the prohibited act with strict liability crimes. They do not have to prove that you had any intent or knowledge of the crime. However, in some cases, you may present evidence to show that you did not commit the act intentionally or knowingly.

This defense is known as a “mistake of fact” and can be used if you genuinely believe you were not committing a criminal act. For example, in our earlier scenario, if you can prove that you genuinely didn’t see the signs indicating entry was prohibited, you may be able to use the “mistake of fact” defense in court.

Civil Cases That Fall Under Strict Liability

African American woman buying alcohol for her friends

While we have mainly discussed criminal cases and what strict liability means there, it is also found in civil law as well. Strict liability in civil court, typically involving product liability and personal injury, or tort law. In these tort cases, the injured party must only prove that the harm was caused by a defective product or negligent action, and intent does not have to be established. This allows for faster and easier resolution of legal disputes.

Civil cases involving strict liability are crucial as they help protect consumers from harm caused by products or actions for which the defendant is responsible, irrespective of intent. A classic example of such a case is when a manufacturer produces a toy that is inherently dangerous and causes injury to a child. In this scenario, the injured party does not need to prove that the manufacturer had specific intent for the toy to be harmful. Instead, they need only to demonstrate that the toy was defective and that this defect directly resulted in injury.

Another example involves abnormally dangerous activity, such as using explosives or storing hazardous materials. If these activities result in injuries caused to individuals or property, you may be held responsible for the damages, even if you took every possible precaution to prevent harm. These examples underscore the legal principle that, in certain situations, the protection of public welfare supersedes the necessity to prove negligence or intent.

The Consequences of a Strict Liability Conviction

Although strict liability crimes often involve minor offenses, they can still have severe consequences. A conviction for a strict liability offense can result in fines, imprisonment, or both, depending on the severity of the crime. Additionally, a criminal record can have significant implications for your future, affecting employment opportunities and even your ability to travel. It is important to understand the laws and regulations related to strict liability in your jurisdiction to avoid unintentionally committing a crime.

For A Strong Legal Defense Against Strict Liability Crimes, Turn To Marinaro Law Firm

If you need a powerful legal defense for your strict liability case in Lancaster, PA, we can help at Marinaro Law Firm. We have decades of experience in criminal law strict liability and how to fight strict liability claims in court. Schedule your legal consultation with our team today and work towards getting your rights restored.

Resources:

PACS – Title 18: Crimes and Offenses; Chapter 3. Culpability; § 302 –  General requirements of culpability.

brand
  • american
  • national
  • satisfaction
  • lifetime